In short, ExpressVPN is a lot better than IPVanish in pretty much every respect. With a lot of important speculation out of the way, let’s look at how our two contenders perform. IPVanish has done something questionable in the past but may have wiped the slate clean. As reviewers, it’s hard to come down on one side or the other: ExpressVPN looks a little suspicious now, but it’s all just rumor.
While we’re obviously against child pornography, here’s the problem: According to the company’s privacy policy at the time, IPVanish shouldn’t have had any logs in the first place, as it promised to be a no-log VPN.Īlthough the company has been bought and sold twice since then, it’s still a black mark against the company and should probably feature in your decision-making process. authorities with the logs of a user suspected of being involved with child pornography. However, where ExpressVPN so far only has rumors counting against it-there’s no proof of wrongdoing, just talk, IPvanish is on the record as divulging user information.īack in 2016, IPVanish provided U.S. Like ExpressVPN, it’s also owned by a large conglomerate called J2 Global (renamed ZiffDavis), which, much like Kape, has some odd ties. That’s a lot of strikes against ExpressVPN, but IPVanish also has some issues when it comes to customer privacy. Having somebody who worked for Raven working at a privacy company was a bad look for the company, although ExpressVPN claimed it was a good thing. citizens as well as human rights activists. When Reuters blew the lid off Raven, it was big news, as it turned out that the team had spied on people from all over the world, including U.S. Raven was a surveillance program set up by the United Arab Emirates and staffed mainly by former U.S. The people behind Kape are former Israeli operatives, and one of ExpressVPN’s executives has ties to Project Raven. On top of that, there is also some talk of ExpressVPN’s entanglement with intelligence agencies. Though this method isn’t around much anymore, it was huge just 15 or so years ago and was definitely a bit of a sleazy way to make money, despite being legal. For one, the company initially made its money through ad injection, which is a questionable technique by which your browser is tricked into displaying certain ads.
0 kommentar(er)
